Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Ryobishi 菱機 RB-09VB 1匹 R32 變頻淨冷窗口式冷氣機 (連遙控)450 x 350 x 640 31 5 RYOBISHI RB 09VB 1 R32 1 R32 3 1 CatechinAg+ 1 (CSPF) 4. 503 2. 5 kW (8,530 BTU hr) 220V 50Hz 6. 3 770 1. 18 (CSPF)4. 503 450 x 350 x 640 29
尺寸闊 450 x 高 350 x 深 640 毫米保養期3年能源效益標籤1級摩打/壓縮機保養期5年
RYOBISHI 菱機 RB-09VB 1匹變頻淨冷窗口式冷氣機結合高效製冷與節能技術，採用 R32 環保雪種並榮獲 1 級能源標籤，是提升家居舒適度的理想選擇。
主要特色
- 採用 R32 環保雪種，具備更高製冷效率，減低對環境的影響。
- 變頻技術能根據室內溫度精確調整運行速度，節省電力並維持恆溫。
- 配備 3 合 1 過濾網，結合防塵網、兒茶素（Catechin）及銀離子（Ag+）濾網，有效抑制細菌及霉菌滋生，同時淨化空氣及減少異味。
- 榮獲 1 級能源標籤，製冷季節性能表現系數 (CSPF) 達 4.503，確保高效省電。
產品規格
- 製冷能力：2.5 kW (8,530 BTU/hr)
- 電源：220V / 單相 / 50Hz
- 額定電流：6.3 安培
- 輸入電壓：770 瓦特
- 除濕能力：1.18 公升/小時
- 製冷季節性能表現系數 (CSPF)：4.503
- 尺寸：闊 450 x 高 350 x 深 640 毫米
- 淨重：29 公斤
- 隨機附送遙控器
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 309 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Very narrow
Size: 10 Wide, Color: Cognac
Run narrow. For very narrow feet. Wide width fits like a regular width.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable Shoes Right Out of the Box
Size: 9, Color: Black
I bought these shoes for my husband. He has a very hard time finding quality, comfortable shoes. These shoes are just as comfortable as his New Balance. He uses them as a dress shoe and wears them at least once a week. There was no break in period necessary. They were comfortable right out of the box! The only thing we didn't like was the white sole color. Once I knew he was going to keep them, I used a black sharpie marker to color the soles black. Instant amazing, comfortable dress shoes. They were well worth the cost. If you or your SO needs a comfortable pair of shoes, we highly recommend them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Paid for new, received used.
Size: 9.5 Wide, Color: Cognac, Size: 9.5 Wide, Color: Cognac
Arrived dirty as if someone whore it for more than a few days. Maybe I was mistaken, but I saw nothing about “previously used” on the Amazon page. Returned it.
I would suggest that the company use quality control when it comes to shipping. The shoes seem find otherwise. I ordered 9.5 and it was just a bit tight. If I reorder I will go for size 10.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Overall Great.
Size: 10.5 Wide, Color: Black
Great product. Great value. Great style. Overall great.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Decent Shoes with Misleading Description (Not Leather)
Size: 12 Wide, Color: Black, Size: 12 Wide, Color: Black
I only look for leather when I’m purchasing dress shoes. Under the description “details” on this item it lists the shoe as leather upper and inner lining. A photo shows “genuine Napa leather lining”. If you keep reading (which I have now that I’ve received the shoes) it shows “faux leather” in the small print and that is not “leather”. I run a small leather business and this irks me because it’s clearly false advertising. The details also show the product is made in Brazil but when they arrived today, the shoe tag shows “Made in China” and “Man Made upper and lower”. I don’t hate the shoes. They look nice. What I know is they won’t hold up over time like leather, which is why the description should be accurate and not misleading.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2026